Tree Dance

What Goes if USAID Goes?

By John R. Platt

The destruction of USAID will create shockwaves throughout the world and worsen the ongoing climate and extinction crises.

This article originally appeared in The Revelator. Please visit to read the original (opens in a new tab).

USAID Feed the Future recipients tend an acre plot in Morogoro, Tanzania.
USAID Feed the Future recipients tend an acre plot in Morogoro, Tanzania. USAID Africa Bureau, via Wikimedia Commons (opens in a new tab)

During the first weekend of February, while the media focused on President Trump’s escalating tariff trade war, a battle of a different type raged on in the offices of the United States Agency for International Development.

Better known as USAID, the independent agency of the U.S. State Department is responsible for administering civilian (i.e., nonmilitary) foreign aid and development assistance. The agency has unquestionably done enormous good throughout the world by helping to alleviate or eliminate diseases, poverty, and other threats.

Many of those efforts take place in the environmental realm, with programs to reduce wildlife poaching and trafficking, tackle deforestation, assist environmental refugees, study animal populations in the wild, and protect people in critical habitats.

But to Musk, USAID is “hopeless” and deserves to be thrown “into the wood chipper.” (opens in a new tab) Over the past few days Musk allies have bullied their way into USAID offices, accessed critical systems (and classified documents), hollowed out the agency’s leadership, turned off the agency’s website, and locked staff out of their headquarters. “We’re shutting it down,” Musk wrote on X.

Many question the legality of these options, but that hasn’t stopped Trump or his allies in any of their regressive activities since he regained power.

If allowed to continue, the destruction of USAID will create shockwaves throughout the world — and worsen the ongoing climate and extinction crises.

Here are just a handful of examples of USAID’s recent environmental efforts:

This just scratches the surface — hundreds of additional examples both large and small existed on USAID’s now-shuttered website (and can still be found on other sites they haven’t figured out how to delete or turn off yet).

And environmental issues comprise just one small portion of USAID’s mandate. Millions of people around the world seem likely to suffer from the assault on this one agency — one of many currently under assault in the second Trump administration.

Of course, the president lacks the authority to kill off a federal agency. As Tess Bridgeman wrote for the website Just Security (opens in a new tab), “while some functions delegated from the president to the secretary of state, and in turn to the administrator of USAID, could likely be pulled back by executive action alone, wholesale dissolution of the agency or formal transfer of functions provided by Congress would require legislation.”

That doesn’t help the employees who have already lost their jobs, the organizations around the world waiting for funding, or the people or animals now in greater jeopardy. But the legal reality is also a bit of a lifeline — if Congress and the courts do their jobs and save USAID from Musk’s woodchipper.

About the author

John R. Platt

John R. Platt (opens in a new tab) is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications.

Thoughts or Comments?

Send us a note, or reach out to us on Mastodon (opens in a new tab) or Bluesky (opens in a new tab).

Article Title
What Goes if USAID Goes?
Written by
John R. Platt
Category
Climate
Topics
Politics
Published
Further reading